|
December 13, 2002
For Immediate Release HEARING INTO ESCARPMENT LAND ADDITIONS TO
PROCEED
|
This letter serves as the position of the Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment on the above-noted Niagara Escarpment Plan Amendment.
The Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment (CONE) was founded in 1978. It is a coalition of 27 environmental and community groups on the Escarpment and across the province. CONE has worked consistently for the protection of the Escarpment and its many values to Ontario society. CONE was involved in the preparation of the Niagara Escarpment Plan in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and in the first five-year review of the Plan in the early 1990s. CONE's activities include monitoring development up and down the Escarpment, educational initiatives to heighten public understanding and appreciation of the Escarpment, participation in government-led studies on Escarpment issues, and regular monitoring of Niagara Escarpment Commission meetings.
Our involvement in matters relating to aggregate extraction on the Niagara Escarpment extends back to our founding 23 years ago. For example, after Cabinet approval of the 1994 Niagara Escarpment Plan, CONE was asked to serve on the aggregate advisory committee that flowed from the 18-month moratorium in the 1994 Plan on processing of new aggregate applications.
Earlier this year, Dufferin Aggregates invited CONE to attend a briefing about the proposed expansion of their Milton Quarry. Three CONE representatives accepted Dufferin's offer and we were briefed at an on-site meeting at the Milton Quarry on February 12, 2001. We appreciate the time that Dufferin Aggregates and its consultants provided for that meeting and the briefing materials (Project Summary, January 2001) that the company provided to us. We have also contacted Dufferin Aggregates more recently to clarify some issues related to natural features on the site of the proposed expansion.
In addition, CONE has reviewed the NEC's initial staff report dated February 15, 2001. We wish to correct one inaccuracy in that report. At the top of page 12, it is stated that American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) is a nationally and provincial threatened species. In fact, American ginseng's status was revised in the year 2000 by the federal government's Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). COSEWIC "up-listed" American ginseng from threatened to endangered. The provincial government's Committee on the Status of Species-at-Risk in Ontario (COSSARO) is still reviewing the new COSEWIC status with a view to regulating American ginseng under the provincial Endangered Species Act.
There appears to be a discrepancy between the NEC initial staff report and Dufferin Aggregates Project Summary regarding habitat of species at risk. (1) On pages 11-12 of the NEC staff report, it is noted that the Halton Forest North Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) is habitat to a number of species at risk, which are listed in the report (American ginseng, Hart's-tongue fern, green violet, red-headed woodpecker, red-shouldered hawk, hooded warbler). A 0.95-hectare portion of this ANSI is within the boundaries of the proposed expansion (although it is outside the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area). Dufferin Aggregates staff have identified this area as deciduous forest; the habitat of American ginseng, to give one example, is deciduous forest. (2) Dufferin Aggregates' Project Summary states, on page 5, that "none of these features [which includes the ANSI forest] are habitat for vulnerable, threatened or endangered species." Clearly, this matter needs to be resolved with a clarification incorporated into the NEC's summary report on this Plan Amendment.
2.2 CONE's Position on the Plan Amendment
CONE is fully cognizant of the fact that the proposal is for an expansion of an existing operation, that it will use existing haul routes, and that it is located close to proposed markets in the "Golden Horseshoe." These are amongst the arguments advanced by Dufferin Aggregates in support of the amendment. However, CONE has re-confirmed, through discussion about the Dufferin Aggregates proposal at a recent meeting of the CONE Board of Directors, its long-standing position on aggregate extraction within the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area.
CONE's position on the Dufferin Aggregates proposed expansion, and for any other proposed new or expanded aggregate operation on the Niagara Escarpment, is as follows:
CONE takes the position that Dufferin Aggregates has not proven indisputably that there is a need for this expansion that cannot be met, either by Dufferin Aggregates or by another aggregate operator, outside the Plan Area. While the Niagara Escarpment Plan allows an application to be made to amend the Escarpment Rural Area designation to Mineral Resource Extraction Area, such an amendment is not granted as of right.
2.3 Provisions to Protect Natural Features if the Amendment is to be Approved
While CONE opposes the amendment, as noted above, we believe it is our duty to make recommendations in the event that Cabinet proposes to approve the amendment. Our recommendations are as follows:
Also referring to the PPS, the Natural Heritage Policies call for development and site alteration to be permitted in "adjacent lands" to significant ANSIs only if it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on the ecological functions for which the areas is identified. MNR's Natural Heritage Reference Manual for Policy 2.3 of the Provincial Policy Statement recommends that for provincially significant ANSIs, the width of "adjacent lands" be 50 metres (page 33). CONE takes the position that not only must the ANSI itself not be quarried, but that at a minimum, this 50-metre buffer area with no aggregate extraction must be built into Dufferin Aggregates' quarrying plans.
We trust that CONE's position on the proposed amendment is clear. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED
Jason Thorne
Executive Director