| October 30, 2003
For Immediate Release
Hamilton Councillor Receives Mixed Reviews for
Escarpment Performance
There's 'room for improvement' says CONE
A coalition of environmental groups has handed Hamilton Councillor Marvin
Caplan a 'C' grade for his performance as Hamilton's representative
on the Niagara Escarpment Commission (NEC).
The Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment (CONE) has been monitoring
decisions made by the NEC - the provincial agency responsible for controlling
development on the Niagara Escarpment - since 1978.
"This report card is based on whether the Commissioner is adhering
to the long-standing provincial policies of the Niagara Escarpment Plan
in the votes that they make," said Jason Thorne, Executive Director
of CONE.
According to CONE, Caplan voted in support of the Niagara Escarpment
Plan on most applications, including several applications for residential
and commercial developments in the Escarpment countryside that, if approved,
would have violated the province's Escarpment policies. CONE also applauded
Caplan for his support for a full environmental assessment for the proposed
Mid Peninsula Highway.
However, in the case of some large, controversial proposals, Caplan
voted against the Plan's provisions. These include a proposal to expand
the massive Dufferin Aggregates quarry at the Escarpment edge near Milton
and the decision to allow the spreading of sewage sludge on Escarpment
lands.
CONE also criticized Caplan for his support of the Red Hill Creek
Expressway.
"The Niagara Escarpment Plan has been in place for nearly 20 years
now," said Thorne. "It has enjoyed support from provincial governments
of all political parties. It has been admired around the world as a
model for controlling development in environmentally sensitive areas.
And it has successfully held back urban sprawl on the Escarpment. By
voting against the Plan on some critical cases, Mr. Caplan risks undoing
all of that."
CONE's report card graded each of the eight Commissioners who were
appointed by the provincial Cabinet to represent the municipalities
that the Escarpment crosses. The report card did not provide grades
for the nine public-at-large appointees. A report card including grades
for all 17 Commissioners is slated for release in January 2004.
Caplan was appointed as Hamilton's representative in March 2001. Although
he was appointed by the provincial Cabinet, he was nominated for the
position by Hamilton Council. That is why CONE has released this report
just prior to the municipal elections.
"Municipal voters don't elect Commissioners directly, but who they
choose as municipal councillors will go a long way toward determining
who ends up representing Hamilton on the NEC," said Thorne. "We want
voters to keep that in mind on election day, because Hamilton deserves
nothing less than 'A+' protection for the Escarpment."
The key to 'A+' protection, according to CONE, is knowing when to
say 'no.'
"Commissioners who received 'A' grades still voted to approve well
over 95% of the development applications that came before them, because
those applications met the provisions of the Niagara Escarpment Plan,"
said Thorne. "But those NEC members recognize that not all development
is good. For the small number of applications that come forward that
violate the provisions of the Niagara Escarpment Plan, an 'A' Commissioner
knows when to say 'no.' "
Caplan was the only municipal member on the NEC who received a 'C'
grade from CONE. CONE awarded 'A' grades to the representatives of Simcoe
County, Peel Region and Dufferin County and handed 'F' grades to the
Commissioners for Halton Region, Grey County and Bruce County. Niagara
Region's representative received a 'D+.'
- 30 -
For more information please contact:
Jason Thorne, Executive Director
Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment
P: (519) 853-4955
Cell: (416) 892-4861
|