|
February 19, 2003
For Immediate Release
Minister's Decision Throws Open the Door to
Rampant Development on the Niagara Escarpment
In his first Niagara Escarpment decision since being appointed Minister
of Natural Resources on April 15, 2002, Jerry Ouellette has dealt a
near-fatal blow to the provincial land-use plan that has been protecting
the Niagara Escarpment since 1985.
The Minister has ignored an independent hearing tribunal's
recommendation and ordered that a Development Permit be granted to an
Escarpment agri-business against the explicit provisions of the province's
Niagara Escarpment (NE) Plan.
The Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment (CONE), an environmental
watchdog group that has been monitoring development on the Escarpment
for 25 years, fears that the Minister's decision could throw the door
open to rampant development on the 750-kilometre-long Escarpment, which
was designated a World Biosphere Reserve by the United Nations in 1990.
"It is because of the Niagara Escarpment Plan that
Escarpment lands have been spared the urban sprawl and rural strip development
that has spread across most of the rest of southern Ontario," commented
Jason Thorne, Executive Director of CONE. "The Minister's decision sends
the message that the land-use policies of the Plan no longer have any
force or effect. That could be disastrous for Escarpment protection."
CONE is not alone in its condemnation of the Minister's
decision.
Len Gertler, distinguished Professor Emeritus, University
of Waterloo, and author of the 1968 report commissioned by then-Premier
John Robarts which ultimately led to the passage of the Escarpment-protection
legislation, wrote a letter to CONE about the case in January. In it
he states, "The creation of one additional rural lot by means of a severance
has much more serious repercussions than may at first be apparent" and
that, as a result of the Minister's decision, "The door would be opened
for destroying the very foundation on which the entire [Niagara Escarpment]
Plan rests."
CONE's legal counsel, Ramani Nadarajah of the Canadian
Environmental Law Assocation (CELA), wrote to the Minister seeking reasons
for his decision, but none has yet been provided.
"This decision is yet another step in the current
provincial government's apparent move away from the historical role
Queen's Park has played as protector of the Escarpment," said Thorne,
who also cited funding cuts and some questionable Cabinet appointments
to the Niagara Escarpment Commission. "By picking and choosing how and
to whom the rules of the Niagara Escarpment Plan are applied, the government
is sending a message to developers that nothing is impossible."
The case in question appeared to be a routine application.
The owner of an Escarpment agri-business applied to the NE Commission
for a Development Permit to build a new home on his farm property on
a proposed new lot. The NE Plan has strict rules on rural lot creation
as a means of controlling strip residential development in the Escarpment
countryside. Despite the fact that the application was in clear violation
of the NE Plan, the Cabinet-appointed NE Commission approved it anyway.
CONE appealed the case to the Environment Review Tribunal,
with legal representation from CELA. A neighbour of the agri-business
also appealed the decision. A hearing was held in January 2002. It included
two days of expert planning evidence from the NE Commission, the Region
of Halton and CONE, all unanimously supporting the position that the
application violated the NE Plan. The Town of Milton also opposed the
application.
In his strongly-worded, 13-page report, Hearing Officer
William Balfour stated that the "fundamental issue" in the hearing was
"Whether or not the NE Commission or the [Environmental Review Tribunal]
has the discretion to bypass the provisions of the ... NE Plan." Balfour
concluded that neither the NE Commission nor the Tribunal had such discretion
and that the application should be refused.
However on December 30, 2002, nearly a year after receiving
the Hearing Officer's report, Minister Ouellette set aside the Hearing
Officer's recommendation, and the provisions of the NE Plan, and ordered
that a Development Permit be granted.
"With the stroke of a pen, Minister Ouellette has
called into question the validity of the rules that have been protecting
the Niagara Escarpment for nearly 20 years," added Thorne. "This could
mark a return to the wild-west days of piecemeal, unregulated development
of this hitherto specially-protected part of Ontario."
Professor Gertler observed, "The issuing of the Development
Permit for this development would establish a precedent for the approval
of similar … applications anywhere in the Escarpment Protection area,
virtually without limit."
Thorne added that, "The fact that the Hearing Officer
released such a strong and unequivocal recommendation, the fact that
absolutely no planning evidence in favour of the application was provided
at the hearing, and the fact that the Minister provided no rationale
for his decision, all lead CONE to the inevitable conclusion that the
Minister's decision must have been politically motivated."
"Since the Minister's decision cannot be appealed,
we can only wait and see what impact it will have on future protection
of the Niagara Escarpment," concluded Thorne.
- 30 -
For more information contact:
Jason Thorne, Executive Director
Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment (CONE)
Phone: (416) 960-2008
Cell: (416) 892-4861
Also available for comment, Mr. Stepan Wood, Professor at Osgoode Hall
Law School, (416) 736-5036.
The letter by Professor Len Gertler
available by fax upon request (January 10, 2003).
Media
Backgrounder |